BlogThe Fluoride Issue Here are more good sources for information on the fluoride controversy: Why Scientists Oppose Fluoridation. Below is a great article to read. Google it and go to this pdf. A lot of hidden information here about the history of fluoridation. [PDF] NEXUS: Fluoride & Manhattan Project
http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-facts.htm The
above link has basic information about the controversy and why 97% of
European cities have banned the use of fluoride in drinking water. This
clip is a real eye-opener!!! Dr, Mullenix designed programs which
proved that Fluoride lowers cognitive functions and damages our nervous
systems. She was fired from her job!
Mullenix is also one more casualty of the fluoride wars. She had nothing to do with the fluoride issue originally, but became involved as part of her work. All she "knew" about fluoride when she started was that it was supposedly good for your teeth. She was not excited about performing the research, but was doing it because she was asked. Her research results were published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology (Vol.17, No. 2, pp.169-177, 1995), the leading scientific journal in the field. Before that paper was published, she presented her findings at the National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) in Maryland, a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH). When she arrived at the NIDR, in her words, "I had no idea what I was getting into. I walked into the main corridors there and all over the walls was 'The Miracle of Fluoride'. That was my first real kick-in-the-pants as to what was actually going on." She said that the display ridiculed the people against fluoridation. "I thought, 'Oh great!' Here's the main NIH hospital talking about the 'Miracle of Fluoride' and I'm giving a seminar to the NIDR telling them that fluoride is neurotoxic!"[48] After her presentation to the NIDR, she met with toothpaste representatives who asked her if she was saying that their products lowered the IQs of children, and Mullenix responded, "basically, yes." That marked the end of her career. When she excitedly announced to her employers that her paper on the intelligence of rats was being published, three days later she was fired. Right after she was fired, her former employers asked her which journal was going to publish her work. By that time, she realized that they wanted to block its publication, so she did not tell them. Subsequently, funding has dried up for that kind of research, though immediately after Mullenix was fired, Colgate gave a $250,000 grant to Forsyth (for a job well done?). The unique equipment Mullenix developed to test rat intelligence was mysteriously destroyed before she could recover it. Dr. Mullenix was then given an unfunded research position at Children's Hospital in Boston, but with no equipment or money. Mullenix said, "The people at Children's Hospital, for heaven's sake, came right out and said they were scared because they knew how important the fluoride issue was...Even at Forsyth they told me I was endangering funds for the institution if I published that information."[49] Mullenix has since applied to the NIH for a research grant to further her research, and was turned down. The NIH told her that fluoride had no central nervous system effects, period. How the NIH concluded that, when about the only published research shows deleterious effects, is curious indeed. The work Mullenix did, as well as other recent studies[50], has shown that the fluoride ion is particularly damaging to the brain's hippocampal region, which is its learning center. Mullenix' fate is common, and my work documents many instances of scientists and others arriving at the "wrong" answers, and having their careers destroyed. Other scientists who had their careers ruined for coming up with the "wrong" answer regarding fluoridation include Dr. Allan S. Gray of British Columbia and Dr. John Colquhon of Auckland, New Zealand. In light of Hodge's secret work for the Manhattan Project, and the secret memos and secret studies that are the tip of the iceberg, every pro-fluoridation effort that uses Hodge's name is tainted. It was with interest that I read Fluoride and Dental Caries. It is a recent book on the subject, published in 1986. The book is a compendium on fluoridation, drawing on various experts in the field. Hodge co-wrote a chapter on fluoride toxicity, and he wrote a chapter dealing with objections to fluoridation. Reading that book was another enlightening process, when I got over my anger. The book gives the appearance of looking at fluoridation from many aspects, but appearance is the operative word. Hodge's work we already know is suspect, to put it mildly, and I looked there first. Hodge's co-author on the toxicology chapter was another fluoridation luminary: Frank Smith from the University of Rochester. With that professional pedigree and affiliation with Hodge, it is nearly certain that Smith was also deeply involved with the Manhattan Project. I take it for granted that with that background, I can trust nothing they write. It is instructive to see the blind spots in their work, and what they are obviously hiding. When Smith and Hodge stated that "No substantive evidence of ill health has ever been offered in children or adults as a result of consuming drinking water containing optimal concentrations of fluoride,"[51] they are voicing the nuclear establishment's damage control opinion, because there is substantial evidence of harm, but they chose to ignore it. When they say, "Since the Danish experience (in the 1930s) crippling fluorosis in an industrial setting has never been seen in the United States or Europe,"[52] take a grain of salt with that statement. With just one declassified study, out of many that exist and are still secret, definite harm occurred, though by playing semantics games we could say they were not "crippled," just toothless, though the long-term effects are unknown, which might be in another classified study. People getting violently ill from du Pont's fluoride cloud is another invisible event, at least to the public, when Hodge and Smith wrote their masterpiece of disinformation. The worst air pollution disaster in U.S. history happened in October 1948 in Donora, Pennsylvania, when an air inversion layer formed over the town for four days, and fluoride emissions from U.S. Steel's zinc and steel facilities killed twenty people and seriously injured hundreds more. If the inversion layer had lasted one more day, a thousand people may have died. U.S. Steel and the PHS conspired to cover-up the disaster, with records missing to this day.[53] Throughout Fluoride and Dental Caries, there were instances of "looking" at objections to fluoridation, and the appearance of looking at them was undertaken. The close relationship between ALCOA, the other fluoride polluters and the early fluoridation researchers is nowhere mentioned, although it is well documented and is consistently one of the biggest issues raised by fluoridation's opponents. A table on the "anti-science" arguments against fluoridation was even produced on page 130, in a chapter titled "Legal, Social and Economics Aspects of Fluoridation," that even mentioned the "Communist conspiracy" aspect of fluoridation. Nowhere was mentioned the obvious economic incentives of fluoride polluters to manage the fluoridation issue, and the well-documented instances of them funding and influencing the fluoridation research, even when it is merely the smoking gun of conflict of interest. The authors of that chapter, including the book's editor, trotted out the words "pseudoscientist" and "quack" to describe fluoridation opponents and their "anti-science." In the chapter purporting to look at the broad spectrum of issues regarding fluoridation, the ALCOA and fluoride polluter issue was spectacularly absent. In Fluoride and Dental Caries, one area caught my interest. In Hodge's chapter on fluoridation objections, he presented experimental evidence by a group of chemists that showed the fluorine ion benign to human chemistry. The research was used to discredit John Yiamouyiannis, who uses the very same research to show how the fluorine ion wreaks havoc in the body. Hodge interpreted the original research, qualifying and minimizing the conclusions, and then he presented the experimental work of pro-fluoridation pal Armstrong. Hodge concluded that the research showed that the fluorine ion was relatively harmless by itself. That part was interesting, because it is the first time that I have seen Yiamouyiannis' science challenged, beyond his cancer statistic analyses with Dean Burk. With knowing Hodge's extreme and formerly secret bias, I cannot trust his writing, particularly regarding the fluoride ion and human harm, but it was interesting reading. When anybody is proven a systematic liar, can you believe anything they say? How do you separate fact from fiction in those cases? The only way I know is to entirely reject their work and become your own expert. Here are some quotes regarding the biological damage the fluorine ion does to human health, the kind you will not find in pro-fluoridation propaganda like Fluoride and Dental Caries. Yiamouyiannis' contentions are herein supported.
"Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting certain enzyme systems. The exact mechanism of such actions is obscure." - Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept 18, 1943. (before the propaganda steamroller really got going in 1947) "The fluoride ion exerts its toxic effect by inhibiting the action of many enzyme systems." - Hugo Theorell, M.D., Nobel Prize winner for his research in the field of enzyme chemistry. "We ought to go slowly. Everybody knows that fluorine and fluorides are very poisonous substances and we use them in enzyme chemistry to poison enzymes, those vital agents in the body. That is the reason things are poisoned; because enzymes are poisoned, and that is why animals and plants die." - James B. Sumner, Director of Enzyme Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Cornell University, and a Nobel Prize winner for his work in the field of enzyme chemistry. "The data indicated that drinking water with as little as 1 PPM shortened the life span of mice an average of nine per cent. This was true whether death was due to cancer or non-cancerous diseases. The only notice proponents of fluoridation gave to this work was to discredit it as much as possible. ... In experiments where the drug was added directly to suspensions of cancer tissue before inoculation into eggs or mice, sodium fluoride stimulated the growth of cancer tissue in concentrations of one part in more than 20 million. Scientists at Cambridge University (British Medical Journal, Oct 26, 1963) discovered that concentrations of sodium fluoride as low as one part in ten million inhibited the growth of a culture of human tissue. ... the growing weight of scientific evidence that water-borne fluorides, even at 1 PPM, have toxic possibilities must finally be recognized." - Alfred Taylor, Ph.D., Clayton Foundation, Biochemical Institute, University of Texas, Austin Texas, 1965. "The terrifying conclusion of the studies was that fluorine greatly induced a cancer tumor's growth. If doctors and the public can be made aware of this catastrophe, fluoridation shall end quickly. It will someday be recognized as the most lethal and stupid "Health Program" ever conceived by the mind of man, witch doctors and blood-letters not excepted." "In 1969 the country of Sweden intended to fluoridate their water supply due to the strong advice of Professor Yngve Ericsson, a Swedish dentist who was also the senior representative on the World Health Organization's Expert Committee on Fluoridation. However, it was then found that Professor Ericsson coincidentally was the holder of two highly-profitable patents on fluoride toothpaste!" - Alfred Taylor, June 13, 1970 the Gothenburg Post (Sweden); August 5, 1970 the News Register (Sweden); and May 1, 1970 Norsk Folkehelselag (Norway). "In 1978, the West German Association of Water and Gas Experts rejected fluoridation for legal reasons, and because 'the so-called optimal fluoride concentration of 1mg/liter is close to the dose at which long-term damage to the human body is to be expected.'" - Chemical and Engineering News, August 1, 1988.
All in all, the tremendous blind spots regarding fluoride polluters, diet and caries, the severe biases regarding the harm done by fluorides, and Hodge's secret mission on behalf of the nuclear establishment rendered Fluoride and Dental Caries virtually worthless, except as an instructive exercise in propaganda. With the now-known nuclear industry's very active though secret management of the fluoridation issue, books like Fluoride and Dental Caries are examples of "pseudoscience" in the strongest sense. The situation of industry and government corrupting science is far from confined to the fluoridation issue. Today, ethyl alcohol, the substance that every drunkard knows well, is added to American gasoline to increase its octane rating. It works great. It was also used eighty years ago. In the 1920s, ethyl alcohol was replaced by tetraethyl lead as an octane booster. Why? As it turns out, nobody could patent ethyl alcohol and make big monopoly profits from putting it into gasoline. Therefore, General Motors, Standard Oil and du Pont conspired to make a new, patentable chemical, and tetraethyl lead was introduced into American gas tanks. Even though even Ben Franklin remarked on lead's well-known toxic qualities hundreds of years ago, and even ancient Romans and Greeks wrote of its toxic properties, industrially-funded scientists in the 20th century labored mightily to make lead appear safe to ingest, even though they knew how deadly tetraethyl lead really was. It is unknown just how many people got sick and died from the effects of lead being spewed into the air during the era of tetraethyl lead, but it is certainly not inconsiderable. In 1985, the EPA estimated 5,000 lead-related heart disease deaths per year, prior to the tetraethyl lead phase out. The lead content of American bloodstreams has fallen precipitously since tetraethyl lead was outlawed. The most notorious of the industrial laboratories that produced the lead "research" was Kettering Laboratories.[54] For generations, Kettering and its industrial sponsors controlled all the lead research. The "Kettering" of Kettering Laboratories was Charles Kettering, the inventor and General Motors executive. Kettering Laboratories is not the only "medical" foundation that he helped bankroll. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the leading cancer research institute in the world, is named after Kettering and his buddy, General Motors CEO Alfred Sloan, another noted "philanthropist." Kettering Laboratories also was instrumental in making aluminum appear to be a benign substance, and Kettering's efforts on the fluoridation issue are well known. http://home1.gte.net/res0k62m/fluoride.htm#conclusion Many aware commentators have fallen silent and bloggers have retired from the This commentator brings us the important information that it is not yet too http://yannone.blogspot.com/ Can you be talked into handcuffing yourself?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.If the Fourth Amendment is important to you, then make sure you know what those 54 words mean. There are only 15 nouns and a handful of common verbs--nothing you haven't heard before. One thing you hardly ever hear, though, is this: Congress can't change the Constitution. Not even if the president signs the bill. Not even if the radio talk show hosts, TV news anchors, and weekend TV news commentators pretend otherwise. The Constitution describes clearly the processes for amending the Constitution. The processes are found in Article 5, outlined here. If these procedures are not followed, then the Constitution remains unchanged. Here's another thing you hardly ever hear: "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void." Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 5, U.S. (Cranch) 137, 174,176 Restated with greater detail: "[a]n unconstitutional act is not a law; ... it imposes no duties; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 442 (1886).Now when you watch this "most important video you watch in your lifetime," you'll know when to laugh your ass off. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6885277369482418431&q=Terror
Continue reading FLASH: IT'S NOT TOO LATE--Why We Can Still Stop the Takeover of America.
For an excellent and concise article on how our supposed land of the free, home of the brave etc. has become land of the fee and home of the warmonger please read this great article :http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/war-and-inflation.htm It is our money system that has made it so and that is why you will never read an open and easy to understand discussion of it in the Main Stream Media. They can't talk about it because it is what enables the machine to go forward. Ron Paul has been unique among mainstream politicians in that he has talked about the role of our banking system and the Federal Reserve in the times we are trying to live through. Here is what the author says:
It seems like with the price of gas and food, the stock market plummeting and the huge surge in mortgage defaults, Americans should be getting a tad more awake, at least as far as looking down that rocky road that lies ahead. We have indebted ourselves and our children into a new post industrial surfdom the likes of which our parents the (World War II generation) never knew. They also never knew and never had to face the chemtrail assault from the skies, or the systematic degradation and poisoning of their food and water. They did not face the loss of the Constitution or of their basic Bill of Rights. We are sailing in unchartered waters and thanks to the total and criminal complicity of our media, we are sailing blind. So what can we as individuals--- lost and getting ever more crushed in the machine-- do? What actions can we take that will be positive and helpful? The first step to helping is the hardest: we must face the truth. We must admit something very strange to our belief system and to everything we have ever been taught and that is simply this: there is a war going on right now and we are the targets. To face the fact that the American people are under attack by globalists and that this attack is physical, financial, psychological and spiritual is the beginning of the first step. And when we have done so, we can start to educate and inform those we know and love, our friends, neighbors, colleages and families. Knowledge is power. Truth is the only way forward. Perhaps the most compelling evidence that we as a people are under attack is the unremitting and massive aerial spray operation now taking place above us in our skies as we speak. If you, like many, have blocked out seeing what is happening above you please watch this "On the Trail of our Assassins" This short utube was made by veteran sky watchers and retired educators, one of whom had been trained as a weather reporter and intimately knew the varieties of clouds and the conditions under which they form. They will instruct you on exactly what to look for in our skies to begin to understand the very serious and deadly program that is being undertaken without our consent or knowledge. We are simply lab rats here, folks. Our lives have about as much value to whomever is behind this as those of the millions of Viet Nam peasantry who were repeatedly soaked and blanketed with deadly toxins such as Agent Orange and worse in order to get rid of the foliage so they could shoot the "enemies". These were civilians. Old men, women children and the unborn....collateral damage as they say. The history of military experiments targeting helpless civilian populations and their plans to begin a program of aerial spraying is well documented and researched.Click here to Check it out for yourself. There is massive research to back up what I say. To return to my original topic, I believe that weather control and modification are one important element being used against the American population. Recently they are really stepping up the program. Evidence of this can be found in the sheer number of bizarre and deadly events that have taken place in this year alone: 2008 NATURAL DISASTERS California Wildfires http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91IHLAG0&show_article=1 Here's a story today about another town losing a levee: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91IHLN81&show_article=1 Here's one on Midwest flooding: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-midwest-stormsjun10,0,1022637.story Then there was the recent Iowa flooding: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/13/AR2008061300480.html?nav=hcmodule And the Iowa Tornado: http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN1130684820080612 And as far as the Iowa flooding goes, many sky watchers and researchers are now theorizing that these floods and storms were deliberately created in order to help the land seize going on to facilitate the huge NASCO superhighway through the heart of America for the purpose of pushing through the NAU, being built against the will of the American people. There are many prosperous farms and family owned businesses they need to get out of the way. What faster way to do this than a storm disaster such as Katrina? Sadly, our denial is so deeply entrenched we simply cannot accept that those who supposedly are responsible for our safety and well-being have so little compunction as to turn their formidable weapons against us, the American people. Well, if you are still in that camp I would ask you to spend just a few moments watching this short clip:$20 bucks . You know that building 7 also fell in the WTC attacks. Did you ever see any clips or videos of its collapse or the fires that were burning previous to the collapse? If you are among the 90% of Americans who have not, just ask yourself why. This was a 500 foot tall building, one of the tallest in the world. So far, the 911 Commission NIST report have no explanation for its perfectly symmetrical 7 second disintegration into its own footprints. One of the world's foremost controlled demolition experts, Danny Jowenko, have publicly stated this to be a clear case of controlled demolition. Were you ever informed of this stupendous discovery? Ask yourself "why not?" This short clip has the beginnings of some answers Who is hiding the truth from us about so many things including the environmentally disasterous and toxic aerial assault going on right now? If you are one of the many bird lovers and watchers in this town, ask yourself what has happened to the birds. Most people I know who are up on such things will tell you they are literally decimated. And the frogs are fast disappearing as well. Ten years ago I had literally dozens of humming birds in my garden. This year, I have seen one. Media lackeys and the public puppets like Al Gore tell us it is climate change and it is somehow our fault. Well, the climate is changing that's for sure. But my research has inclined me to believe that it has more to do with the military's stated goals of "full spectrum dominance" and of "owning the weather." My question is what gives them the right to destroy our environment in order to own it? Are you happy that they are using your tax dollars to do so? I don't have answers for you. I only have questions. You will have to research and find your own answers. Don't wait for CNN to find out for you or you will wait until it's way too late.  I hope that you had a chance to read my post on the forced aerial spraying
now slated to take place in California this summer. Ann Arbor Mi is a long long
way from Northern California. We really don't need to lose any sleep over the
fact that the people in those far away cities and communities will be subject to
forced spraying for an obscure pest that may or may not threaten a crop that
plays a minor part in their economy.
Or do we?
In this short video linked below, General Major Albert Stubblebine explains
just why we should be concerned. He points out that 40 years ago our military
subjected the population of Viet Nam as well as members of our own armed forces
to prolonged and repeated aerial spray exposures to Agent Orange (google 'Agent Orange' for a real eyeopener) which was being
used simply as a defoliate, not as a weapon. Despite millions of deaths from
direct exposure during this time (including 10's of thousands of our own
soldiers), our government claimed that this toxic chemical posed no long range
health threats or genetic consequences for human beings. Though at that time
this information was soundly contested by independent scientists, it took
government agencies 25 years begin to admit that perhaps this potent carcinogen
and neurotoxin had lasting effects.
General Stubblebine who was in Viet Nam and exposed to Agent orange has had
cancer three times which he suspects are linked with this chemical. "There is no
telling how hundreds of thousands of others others" like himself also have been
struck with cancer and other Agent Orange related diseases or how many millions
of families are now facing genetic tragedy from Agent Orange.
At this very moment sprays are falling on you emitted from airplanes our
government will not even acknowledge exist. Researchers all over the world are
independently coming to the conclusion that this spraying is for the purpose of
military research, weather control, and the creation of interfaces for electro
magnetic field weapons. Researchers in Arizona now have results from laboratory
analysis of these sprays and their fall out which show that with every breath
you take you are inhaling a toxic brew of plastic nano particles and heavy
metals. Major Stubblebine informs us from his own personal experience that this type of forced aerial spraying is
called genocide. Will you go silent into that good night?
Look up people! Today started out completely clear with a flawless blue over head. Unmarked white jets moved in fast, laying down layer after layer of slowly expanding white chemical/clouds. These artificial clouds are the interface for weather control and for electro magnetic weapons. To those responsible I ask...WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT? (google carole pellatt for more photos, essays and links about the assault on our skies) I posted the above two hours ago. Right now at 12:58pm Tues, a weird unexplainable rainbow has formed above Ann Arbor. Go out and look folks. We are under assault.
Today, several items have come to my attention which raised all sorts of alarm bells and adrenal surges as I contemplated what they could mean for our future. I am posting them here so we can all share the anxiety rush together....and also because they say a ton about who we are and what we are becoming. In this article we see the secret web (a web rarely referred to or mentioned in the main stream media) government organizations have woven around our cushy lives as we watched the Nascar races, followed the clothing styles of Britiney and worried about our incipient wrinkles. Little did we know, as we sat mesmerized on our couches in front of the homey glow of our tvs, THIS (http://www.counterpunch.org/glendenning06192008.html) was unfolding--total nonstop surveilance by the feds into our mail, e-mail, purchases, movements, internet use and phone calls. Feel safer now? Nor did the msm show us the full and complete scene that accompanied this young man's brutal tazering and bludgeoning by cops for simply asking a question during a speech by Senator John "Election Fraud" Kerry (remember him-- the guy who kept millions in "campaign funds from an election he had already arranged to "lose"?). Here's the video showing exactly what befell this student. The really frightening part for me was the zombie-like appearance of the audience--as if it just was a normal everyday event to watch 5 brutes wearing uniforms and guns seize, pummel and electrify someone exercising his first amendment rights and seeking to engage with a speaker he has listened to for over two hours. Guess all those years watching cop shows and violent attacks, both fictional and real, made them feel it's just how things are. I say it's shocking. What if this were your son? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-PcS-s9WtQ True, the kid was a little miffed at Kerry, but you know I campaigned for John Kerry and I gave him money. I want it back. He cheated me; he didn't even try to contest the obviously fixed election results. I can understand the victim's feelings. John Kerry owes his supporters an explanation for this and it has not yet been forthcoming. I would like him to answer those questions posed there that night. Will I be tazed for this? Recently, a radio celebrity has announced that certain people in our country should be murdered or placed before a firing squad for differing with the views that he thought were the correct and "patriotic" ones. He even offered to supply the bullets for this. Those among us who follow the 911 Truth movement have heard all about Michael Reagan and his offer to aid and abet murderers who wish to avenge Michael Dice for sending free material to our troops stationed abroad concerning the possible reasons they are risking their lives and health in Iraq. For the rest of us, this bizarre outrage barely stirred the surface of the msm's placidity. After all, no one was threatening to buy bullets for their assassination. Here is the full scoop about a media figure with a following of thousands who actually called for and instigated the murder of a U.S. citizen. http://reagandeaththreat.com/. If, for example, Ralph Nadar went on the air and urged that certain Republicans such as Ann Coulter be murdered, can you imagine the storm of outrage that would surge through every media outlet 24/7 until Ralph was arrested and tried for threatening and endangering people? But our media didn't seem to feel this to be a worthy topic, given the the perspective targets of Reagan's bullets. Are we being conditioned to accept the idea that some peoples' opinions actually make them legitimate targets of terrorism and harassment from media figures and others, including threats involving the use of firearms and violence? If so, this is contemptible and we are living out the beginning of a nightmare. Tim Russert died last week as I'm sure you all know. While I have nothing
against him as a person and I sympathize with his family for their loss, the
loss to honest journalism will be minimal at best. His contribution to keeping the public informed about issues vital to our national interests was, to put it mildly, disappointing. Tim was
monumentally silent on a huge number of issues, as this commentator disgustedly
notes . Regardless of his lack of vigilance on our behalf, the
criminally complicit media is beating its collective chest in a paroxysm
of public grief such as we haven't seen since Ronnie Reagan said his good-byes.
Perhaps all this noise is meant to distract us from things such as this story about the USS Liberty and the buried truth about the Israeli attack on an American ship during the Six Day War in 1967, in which at least 30 crewmen died. According to this author, on that day, Lyndon Johnson, then president, callously sacrificed the men on that ship in order to appease our Israeli "friends". Johnson actually forbid other ships to come to the crew's rescue for fear that word would get out that the false flag attack was indeed staged by Israel. The heroic surviving crew and captain of that ship are at last breaking their decades of government enforced silence in which they were threatened with imprisonment if they revealed the truth. As our Japanese friend Yukihisa Fujita, Japanese lawmaker and fearless truth teller, said in his recent press conference in Berlin about the attacks of 911, "things can't be hidden anymore". People are increasingly getting their news and information from the internet and not from the criminals who have been running our media and controlling what we know. They can't keep the truth from us now: we are unstoppable. My favorite news story that Tim Russert did NOT cover was the one about Dov
Zakheim and
the missing pentagon trillions. It was, however, briefly touched upon by the NY
Times on Sept 10, 2001 in a press conference given by Donald Rumsfeld in
which he announced to the world that 2.1 trillion dollars could not be accounted for in the pentagon's books. They lost it. That's around $8,000 for every man, woman and child in the entire country. To see an actual video of Rumsfeld making this announcement go to this video to around the 5:30 point.
This stupendous piece of news was completely buried in the gory chaos and dark
days that followed the attacks on the WTC and the pentagon on Sept 11.
In the meantime, Dov Zakheim, on whose watch the 2.1 trillion
disappeared, stayed on as
comptroller in the pentagon until sometime in 2004 when it was quietly
announced that another trillion or so was again missing. At this time the good
rabbi moved on to a firm later accused of having as its client a charity funded by Osama bin Laden, Booz Allen. http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/sns-worldtrade-kadi-ct,1,2512541,full.story.
911 researchers have discovered that many of those who died at the pentagon on
9/11 were accountants and office workers in the pentagon accounting office. The plane
and/or missile which punched a hole into the facade and then pierced through
three inner concrete walls with its aluminum nose (if you believe that
story....I've got some very hot real estate for you) just happened to hit the
Pentagon's accounting department, killing many of the staff and destroying
numerous records and files. And only a day after Rummy announced that something had gone terribly wrong with the books. Luckily for him, Dov Zahkeim was away from the office
that morning. In order to hit the accounting office which was on the other side
of his direct flight path, the alleged pilot of that alleged plane had to make a
270 degree turn while banking steeply as he descended towards his destination.
This feat of aviation was considered difficult-- if not impossible-- by many
seasoned commercial pilots. Our attacker, while being denied permission to rent
a Cesna because of incompetence, was able to flawlessly complete this
performance on his very first flight of a large commercial jet. Recently,
Zakheim returned to the scene of the crime like the proverbial serial killer and
in an act of seemingly amazing audacity, has dedicated a shrine which includes a
Talmud at the exact site where so many of his coworkers perished so unexpectedly
(for them) Sept 11.
While all this has strayed far from the original topic, these facts taken altogether reveal an insidious and ongoing assault on our nation that Tim Russert (and all the others like him) have ignored and continue to ignore, AT OUR PERIL. To get back to my opener about the sadly missed Tim Russert, though he did
provide us with hours of entertainment, distraction and false leads, he failed
miserably to deliver to us the message we most needed to know concerning a
brutal, imperialistic and self-destructive war that has damaged our military
(perhaps permanently), and destroyed our morale as well as our standing in the
world.It was a very simple message really and could have saved us a world of
grief. A journalist half worthy of the name would have moved heaven and earth to
get the message through. I couldn't put it better or with fewer words
than Mark Yanonne here An excerpt follows: "the United States federal government's activity in the Middle East is
largely driven by its need to tie the Federal Reserve Note to something of
value, namely petroleum. It has nothing to do with the "liberation" of Iraqis,
terrorism, democracy, or religion. Iraqis do not consider themselves liberated,
nor did they ask to be "liberated," the United States federal government are the
terrorists, democracy is a form of government that no one wants -- including
Americans --............... The fatal decision was ours, when we Americans
decided to allow our United States federal government to violate the
Constitution by substituting a fiat currency for our lawful money."
These are oil wars, alright. The wars, the coming financial tsunami and the destruction of America all
will have resulted from the illegal activities of a private enterprise known as The
Federal Reserve. Their accumulated debt was the driving force behind our need to attack Iraq and now Iran.
It was these corporate criminal bankers who constructed the giant ponzi scheme-- the bill for which is now coming due and for which we will pay with our blood and with
the futures of our children. Tim Russert didn't tell us this, nor did the
NY Times or the Chicago Tribune or the LA Times. And they aren't telling us now.
Will we ever wake up?
Yukihisa Fujita, a prominent new member of the truth movement, is not letting them get away with it !! Since Dec of last year, Mr. Fujita, an influentual member of the Japanese Diet (the Diet is the equivalent to our U.S. Senate) has been calling for a new investigation into 911. He has done several presentation for the members of the Diet in which he distributed info packs (including dvds) from many prominent 911 research sites such as AE911truth.org He is now in the process of visiting various government officials in Europe, educating them about the 911 truth movement, and holding press conferences. Here is his latest in Germany http://www.911blogger.com/node/16213 Hey Mr. Bush, you are toast......and Israel will go down with you http://smokingmirrors.blogspot.com/2008/06/israel-and-911-are-siamese-twins.html |
